Logo
Log in Sign up


← Back to Stock Analysis

Earnings Transcript for ADTN - Q3 Fiscal Year 2023

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the ADTRAN Holdings Inc. Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Release Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] During the course of the conference call, ADTRAN representatives expect to make forward-looking statements that reflect management’s best judgment based on factors currently known. However, these statements involve risks and uncertainties and including ability of component supplies to align with customer demand, the successful development and market acceptance of our products, competition in the market for such products, the product and channel mix, component costs, flight and logistics costs manufacturing efficiencies, our ability to effectively integrate mergers and acquisitions and other risks detailed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2023. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, which may be made during the call. The investor presentation found on ADTRAN Investor Services Relations website has been updated and is available for download. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Tom Stanton, Chief Executive Officer of ADTRAN Holdings. Sir, please go ahead.
Tom Stanton: Thank you very much. Good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us for our third quarter 2023 earnings conference call. With me today is ADTRAN Holdings CFO, Ulrich Dopfer. Following my opening remarks, Ulrich will review the quarterly financial performance in detail, and then we’ll take any questions that you may have. Before reflecting on the quarter, I’ll start off by addressing the announcement that we made yesterday. We have taken decisive steps to transform our business to a leaner, more efficient and more profitable company. We have already implemented and have recently expanded a business efficiency program focused in two key areas
Ulrich Dopfer: Thank you Tom and hello everybody. I will cover our third quarter 2023 results and provide our expectations for the fourth quarter. Please note that Q3 2023 results include a full quarter consolidation of the ADTRAN Networks financials, which affect year-over-year comparisons. Since this is the case, I will refrain from repeating the consolidation effects when discussing the year-over-year comparisons of our results. I will be referencing non-GAAP information with reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures presented in our press release. And also certain revenue information by segment and category, which is available on our Investor Relations web page at investors.adtran.com. In addition, we have updated the investor presentation to the site, which is available for download. Unless stated otherwise, all financials are presented in U.S. dollars. Q3 2023 revenue came in at $272.3 million and was down 20% year-over-year and down 17% quarter-over-quarter. Our Network Solutions segment accounted for 83.9% of revenues in Q3 compared to 89.5% in Q3 2022 and 86.4% in Q2 2023. Our Services & Support segment contributed 16.1% of revenues in Q3 2023 compared to 10.5% in the year ago quarter and 13.6% in the previous quarter. Access and Aggregation contributed 34.8% of revenue and grew 7.3% compared to the year ago quarter, but was down 7.9% compared to the previous quarter. Our optical networking solution category contributed 42.7% of revenues and was down 2.2% year-over-year and down 18.7% quarter-over-quarter. Subscriber Solutions continued to struggle and was down 54% year-over-year and 24.7% quarter-over-quarter and contributed 22.6% of Q3 revenues. As Tom mentioned earlier, all three revenue categories were impacted by constrained customer spending. Regionally, year-over-year, third quarter domestic revenue was down 34.3%, and international revenue declined 6%. International revenue made up 59.1% and domestic revenue contributed 40.9% of total Q3 revenues. We had one 10% or more of revenue customer in Q3. Q3 non-GAAP gross margin was 40.3% and increased by 220 basis points year-over-year and 170 basis points sequentially. The year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter increase is due to lower purchasing and transportation costs and a more favorable customer and product mix. Our cost synergies are starting to show the expected effects. Compared to Q3 2024, which was a quarter with only a partial contribution, our non-GAAP operating expenses were $114.9 million, increasing by 5% year-over-year. However, compared to Q2 2023, non-GAAP operating expenses decreased by 6%. We reduced non-GAAP R&D spend by 4% and SG&A expenses by 8% quarter-over-quarter. Non-GAAP operating expenses were 42.2% of revenue compared to 32% of revenue in Q3 2022 and 37.5% of revenue in Q2 2023. Non-GAAP operating loss was $5.1 million, which translates into a non-GAAP operating margin of negative 1.9%. The quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year decrease in our operating profitability is due to lower revenues, partially offset by increased gross margins and operating expense improvements. The company’s non-GAAP tax provision for the third quarter of 2023 was $6.8 million. The company’s GAAP tax was a benefit of $16.6 million. The difference between the GAAP and non-GAAP rate was mainly driven by the jurisdictional mix of the non-GAAP adjustments during the quarter. Closing out the income statement results. Total non-GAAP net loss was $13.7 million and a net loss of $10.8 million after adjusting for minority shareholder interest in ADTRAN Networks SE. This resulted in diluted loss per share attributable to the company of $0.14 per share. Turning to the balance sheet and cash flow statement. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $116.1 million at quarter end. Cash flow generated from operations was $6.8 million and improved by $23 million compared to the previous quarter. Trade accounts receivables were $229.3 million at quarter end, resulting in DSO of 77 days compared to 67 days in the prior quarter. Inventories were $374 million at the end of the third quarter, resulting in terms of 2.0% compared to 2.3% in Q2 2023. Inventory includes the write-off of $21 million as we accelerated the end of life of certain products to streamline our product offerings. Accounts payable were $148.9 million, resulting in DPO of 60 compared to 59 in the previous quarter. As Tom mentioned earlier, we decide – we have taken decisive steps towards a much leaner and more efficient company. Furthermore, we have taken measures to de-lever our balance sheet and strengthen our capital structure. For this reason, we implemented and expanded a business efficiency program, which consists of a cost efficiency program and a capital efficiency program. With the cost efficiency program, we are expecting annual savings of $90 million by the end of 2024. The key initiatives of the program are
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of George Notter from Jefferies. Please go ahead with your question.
George Notter: Hi, guys. Thanks very much. I guess I wanted to ask about the excess inventory that’s out there. If I go back, I think, 3 months ago, you guys were looking at the CPE pieces of the business kind of kind of running that inventory off by the end of the year. And I think on the optical side of the business, I think you thought maybe you could run it off by Q1 of next year. And now based on your comments, it sounds like that inventory is larger and it’s going to linger for longer. Can you talk about what you’re seeing in the marketplace? Where is that inventory? And why is it a surprise to you in terms of the depth and duration of the correction. Thanks.
Tom Stanton: Yes. George, at this point in time, I think it’s – there’s – it’s a little opaque. It’s exactly what is inventory versus what is kind of capital constraint. Actually, people trying to lower their expense level. I think the inventory levels on the CPE side, I don’t think that they’re high, but I think people are just starting to run leaner and leaner. And I think it’s very similar on the optical side. What we’ve seen is we don’t see a lot of inventory out there, but what we’re seeing is projects actually just being moved. And as you probably know, the – the WDM portion of that business. A lot of that is project oriented where they do an upgrade. And we’re seeing those upgrades, and we literally saw that through the quarter where they were moving these upgrades into next year. So it’s not – you wouldn’t call that inventory, right? That was literally just a movement from one quarter to another. And that’s kind of where – that’s kind of what we’re seeing.
George Notter: Got it. Okay. That makes sense. And then…
Tom Stanton: I would say at this point is – let me just read it, I’d say at this point, it’s probably more environmental than inventory.
George Notter: Okay. And then maybe also, I guess you mentioned that one bright spot in the business was regional service providers. I think in quarters past, you guys have given us some compares on the fiber-to-the-prem OLT side of things. Can you give us any sense for how that business was growing with regional service providers quarter-on-quarter or year-on-year?
Tom Stanton: OLT business, yes, the OLT business in the U.S., let’s say, Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3, the regional service providers was actually – I don’t have the number in front of me, but I have seen the number and it was actually up sequentially and year-over-year. So, that is a bright spot, that piece.
George Notter: Got it. Okay. Can you give us a sense for how big the U.S. regional service providers are as a percentage of sales at ADTRAN now?
Tom Stanton: Do you know Ulirch that…?
Ulrich Dopfer: About 30% – 30%, 35%, the mid-30s.
George Notter: Okay. Great. And then last one, I think you mentioned on the call that software is now more than 10% of sales. Can you talk about that? What I assume we are talking about Mosaic or are there other pieces here? Is it mostly in SaaS and recurring models? Is it in perpetual license model? Just talk a bit about that software business and what we are talking – what we are looking at there. Thanks.
Tom Stanton: Yes. So, we don’t have that breakout, but I can talk to you just kind of in general terms. So, it does include all of that. The software piece there are two ways that we actually – let’s say, three ways. We do perpetual licenses. We do software and software maintenance, right. So, we have long-term maintenance contracts on that software which is typically a larger company model. And then we have our SaaS products, the most notable one being Mosaic. I would say if you look at recurring versus non-recurring, which is kind of the big metric that we look at, it’s about it’s about a third, maybe a third to 40% is recurring, and then the rest of it is non-recurring, and we are doing everything we can do to move that to change that metric.
George Notter: Got it. Okay. Alright. Thanks very much. I appreciate it.
Tom Stanton: Okay.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Genovese from Rosenblatt Securities. Please go ahead with your question.
Michael Genovese: Great. Thanks. So, I think in prior quarters, recently, we heard about the sort of larger U.S. Tier 1 and Tier 2 order softness. It seems as I look through this at the most meaningful change, we sort of inventory correction, order softness spreading to the European customers. Is that – I mean I don’t know if spreading is the right word, but that’s kind of the incremental change, was the European demand getting softer, is that a fair read?
Tom Stanton: I would say that’s probably the environmental, yes, that’s the environment because the U.S. is already soft. The larger carriers in the U.S. were already soft. So, I think we saw it in Europe and then probably more impactful on the optical side of the business. So, we saw that increase. Now, we kind of expected that to increase coming out of this year, not as much as it did. We really did see a lot of projects, predominantly in the U.S. like I mean, excuse me, in Europe that just kind of shifted into next year.
Michael Genovese: Okay. And then if I could – that’s helpful. If I could go back to the regional service provider, when George was asking the question, what was coming to my mind is that it was really sort of Tier 3 focused question and – but I guess it sounds like from your answer that your definition of regional includes Tier 1s, Tier 2s and Tier 3s, can you….?
Tom Stanton: No, no, no, includes depending on – I mean the Tier 3 RSP number was on OLTs was actually up. I think – I don’t think Tier 2 really affected it never includes Tier 1s.
Michael Genovese: Got it. Okay. That’s also helpful. And then I mean just basically, it seems like for the actual – the third quarter, right, I mean the weakness was really in subscriber solutions. But it must be the order intake more for optical and somewhat for access and aggregation, in the third quarter must have been disappointing, right, to get to this fourth quarter guide. So, I mean I would say that access and aggregation and optical have held up, but we are – it seems like we are kind of – I mean we are expecting those to be much softer in the fourth quarter. I just want to verify that.
Tom Stanton: The answer, yes. I mean we expect the same kind of pressure. Optical will be – right now, our expectation is optical will actually be farther down than where we expect access and aggregation to drop as far as on a percentage basis. So, that’s really – and like I have said, the project move-outs are probably the biggest thing that you can highlight as far as our kind of relooking at Q4. And then just really no rebound and no bounce up on any of the other pieces of the business.
Michael Genovese: Okay. Well, that’s – I would appreciate the really helpful responses. Thank you, Tom.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ryan Koontz from Needham & Company. Please go ahead with your question.
Ryan Koontz: Hi. Thanks for the question. I wanted to maybe come at this a different angle here, Tom. As you are talking about capital constraints at providers here, tightening spending? And I think about that as probably as affecting the OLT business, where you have all the capital intensity around labor, putting the fiber in the ground. And why wouldn’t customers be more focused on success-based spending and lighting up SaaS [ph] in their existing footprint. And so why aren’t we seeing CPE rebound given the customer constraints?
Tom Stanton: Yes, that’s a really good question. And I think – and I would agree with you. I mean there are things that are more easily moved out than other things, right. And new footprint expansion is typically one of the things that’s just easier to move, same thing with some of these WDM projects. I think some of it is just kind of what the plan build was. So, I mentioned we shipped just a ton of ports out of the SDX, but that was planned for a long time, and there was part of that expansion. But I will tell you that even in that case, where we are shipping SDX ports, a lot of it is to add more ports to kind of existing footprint. So, it’s kind of increasing your homes pass on that existing footprint. So, they are not – so I think even in those cases, they are trying to minimize the capital and labor cost with adding to their commitments on their homes passed. You are absolutely right on subscriber. We expect just from the business and on the homes past ports that we are shipping now to see an uptick in that business in the first half, but we just haven’t seen it – we just haven’t seen it yet.
Ryan Koontz: Fair enough. Okay. Thanks. That’s helpful. And regarding your guide for Q4, and I heard your comments, it sounds like some of this real tightening is starting to impact Europe. I wonder specifically, I heard from another vendor about some changes in the regulatory climate in Germany as it relates to some of the fiber broadband subsidies. And are you seeing any of that impact in your German customers included in your guide, or is this just unrelated and driven by just pure capital conservation.
Tom Stanton: It’s just pure capital conservation. But that is spotty. So, like if I look at, let’s say, Germany, that business on fiber-to-the-home, we expect to pick up even in the near-term. And that’s just because of where we are with 6330 lab approvals and where they are with homes passed. Now, project-related like optical business, we expect to continue to slide. So, those are the two pieces. And in Germany, actually, we would expect a stronger – we expect a stronger Q4 and actually Q1.
Ryan Koontz: Okay. Great. Thank you for that Tom. And can you remind me of the revolver terms you guys have right now? Any planned changes in that structure?
Ulrich Dopfer: No, the terms are still the same. No change.
Ryan Koontz: Got it. Alright. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Tim Savageaux from Northland Capital Markets. Please go ahead with your question.
Tim Savageaux: Hi. Good morning. A couple of questions about the Q4 guide. It looks like based on a separate report, out of the kind of legacy ADVA, but that’s expected to be flattish into Q4. I don’t know if that’s a lot of decline in optical and some strength in enterprise. But – so it would seem based on that, that most of the weakness is coming from the kind of legacy ADTRAN side. I wonder if you could confirm that and talk to whether that has a geographic focus to it in Q4? And kind of as an aside to that, maybe ask the same question about regional service providers for your Q4 guide as you answered earlier for Q3, which is, I don’t know if you expect that to grow in Q4, but do you expect it to outperform? Thanks.
Tom Stanton: Let me get on the first piece, and I will ask Ulrich. I am not sure how we are getting – how we are coming to that number. But our expectation right now is the optical piece of the business is going to be down materially. That’s the biggest drop. So – and so that’s the legacy ADVA piece of the business, which we do expect to be – that’s kind of the big change as those project movements. Ulrich, you want to touch.
Ulrich Dopfer: Yes. It’s going to be further down. And if you recall it, last quarter, the ADVA side of the business updated the yearly guidance to down to the low teens for the year. So, I don’t know where you got the read from the ADVA or ADTRAN Networks that side will continue to be on that level where it’s currently at. So again, the yearly guidance for the ADTRAN Network is in the low teens.
Tim Savageaux: Okay. Fair enough. What I am reading here is high-single digits to low teens, so taking the midrange there. But really, we are on the bottom end of that range. That’s fair enough.
Ulrich Dopfer: That comes – like Tom said earlier. Yes. Like Tom said earlier, the order entry was disappointing on the ADTRAN on the optical side. And the push-outs were actually the big mover, right, the push outs into next year from many of the projects that were originally scheduled for the fourth quarter.
Tim Savageaux: Okay. Well, then it sounds like on that basis that you could have some decent expectations for regional in Q4, but I just wanted to follow-up on that question.
Tom Stanton: Yes. It’s been relatively consistent. OLT shipments have been relatively consistent, just ongoing. And they are not – there was a period, not that long ago, where they are growing 30% or 40% a year. But at this point in time, they are kind of just flattish and we are okay with flat right now, needless. So, I would – I don’t have that exact number, but I would expect them to operate the way and behave the way that they have been behaving. Does that get your question?
Tim Savageaux: Yes. Great. Thanks very much.
Tom Stanton: Okay. At this point in time, it looks like we are – we have no more questions in the queue. So, I appreciate everybody joining us for the call today. We hope to very soon be able to have these calls be a little bit brighter. I just want to leave you with the solid sense that we understand the environment we are in. We are making the changes in the way that we operate the business in order to be able to weather the environment that we are in. That will absolutely play – that will absolutely help us and accelerate the growth coming out of this period of time, but we are committed to getting it done. So, thank you everybody for joining us today.
Ulrich Dopfer: Thank you
Operator: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.