Logo
Log in Sign up


← Back to Stock Analysis

Earnings Transcript for NOPMF - Q3 Fiscal Year 2023

Operator: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Neo Performance Materials Inc. Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] This call is being recorded on Friday, November 10, 2023. And I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Ali Madhavi, Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
Ali Mahdavi: Thank you, operator and good morning, everyone. Just as a reminder, a replay of this call will be available starting tomorrow in the Investor center on our website at neomaterials.com. Joining me this morning are Rahim Suleman, Neo's Chief Executive Officer; and Jonathan Baksh, Neo's Chief Financial Officer. Please note that some of the information you will hear during today's presentation and discussion will consist of forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those regarding revenue, EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, product volumes, product pricing, other income and expense measures, cash returns and future business outlook, including potential expansion plans and contracts. Actual results or trends could differ materially from those discussed today. For more information, please refer to the risk factors discussed in Neo's most recent financial filings which were filed on SEDAR earlier today and are also available on our website. Neo assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements or information which speak as of their respective dates. Financial amounts presented today will be in U.S. dollars. Non-IFRS financial measures will be used during this conference call. Further information regarding Neo's use of non-IFRS measures is available in Neo's year-end earnings press release which is also available on SEDAR and our website at neomaterials.com. Let me now turn the call over to Rahim.
Rahim Suleman: Thanks, Ali and good morning, everyone. It's been a little more than 100 days since I've been in the role of CEO. And as you might expect, that first 100 days has been a whirlwind. I've recently slept in more hotel rooms and airplanes than in my own bed. But it has been worth it to spend quality time meeting with our employees, local leadership teams, key customers, key partners, industry colleagues and other critical stakeholders around the world. Frankly, I've never been more excited about Neo's future with our extraordinarily talented employees, technical knowledge, a diverse manufacturing base and a unique value proposition. These have helped to drive our decades of experience in product innovation, our loyal customer base and our positive free cash flow generation. Yet these have not been fully reflected in our growth opportunities or in our share price. Despite having more cash and inventory than our actual market cap, despite having 10 well-capitalized manufacturing facilities around the world and despite offering our customers a unique parallel supply chain for rare earths, both inside and outside of China, our share price reflects a significant undervaluation of this company. Somewhere in this market dynamic, the core story of our opportunities and our capabilities is just not taken hold. So I'd like to use this morning to share my thoughts on the future focus of Neo. The industry at large and the growth case of why Neo will succeed as a global leader in the rare earth magnetics industry. Jonathan will then take you through the third quarter results. In addition to our earnings release, we will be publishing an updated investor presentation outlining our vision, our opportunity and our road map. I won't specifically walk through that presentation today, but it provides for some context for what we see as a generational opportunity in front of this company and why Neo is best placed to capitalize on this opportunity which leads me to our new vision, to fast forward the clean energy transition as a global leader in rare earths magnetics and critical materials. Now maybe that doesn't sound too different from Neo's story over the past years. We're already global, we're already based in rare earths and we are a magnetics company. But Neo has not participated in the largest and most valuable application of rare earth magnets, sintered magnets. We have built the number one specialty bonded magnet business as the absolute leader but in a niche market with a nuance and a nuance that is an important takeaway. The sintered rare magnet market is roughly 15x to 20x larger than the bonded magnet market and the sintered market will also continue to grow incredibly fast due to electric vehicles, wind turbines and other energy-saving applications. Neo maintains other critical material businesses that performed quite well. They are profitable, positive cash flow, sticky product categories that will remain engineered into critical applications for many years. Many of these will be part of the future of Neo and will be a source for both, but I won't speak to those at length today as I want to spend more time defining the generational opportunity in sintered magnets and Neo's vision to be a driving force in this segment. With that in mind, let me go a little bit deeper as to why we are so excited to be talking about our rare earth magnets expansion. There's a culmination of several macro trends that set up this growth opportunity
Jonathan Baksh: Thanks, Rahim and good morning, everyone. Rahim outlined our vision and growth strategy moving forward. I'll focus on our Q3 performance while emphasizing why we're in a financial position to deliver the strategic objectives Rahim just outlined. Q3 shaped up to be a positive quarter. We reported sales of $137 million and adjusted EBITDA of $13 million. Our net income was $3 million and we reported diluted earnings of $0.07 per share. Our ability to generate positive free cash flow and a decline rare earth pricing environment has been evident through the first 9 months of the year. We had generated about $42 million in free cash flow, while meaningfully expanding our growth CapEx. Our Q3 sales were 7% lower year-over-year driven by declining rare earth prices, partially offset by higher volumes. Yet, our adjusted EBITDA improved by over 80% compared to the same quarter of the prior year which was adversely impacted by negative lead lag. Our Q3 performance was a step in the right direction as our expected margin profile showed signs of re-emergence in a less volatile rare earth pricing environment. Taking a closer look at rare earth pricing. The key rare earth inputs for magnetics, neodymium and praseodymium averaged $69 per kilogram this quarter compared to $114 in the prior year period or a decrease of about 40%. As we've talked about before, the real critical measure for us is not the absolute price levels as we have passed through pricing with many of our customers, but instead it's price volatility which creates lead lag risk over short periods of time. So focusing on price volatility, we are happy to report that we've seen stability in rare earth magnetic prices over the past 6 months. For context, neodymium and presodemium pricing has been range-bound moving between roughly $65 to $75 in Q2 and Q3 this year. Compare that to the same period prior year where pricing was on a steep downward trend from $145 to $95. The key takeaway being we're in a less volatile pricing environment which results in less lead lag impact. Neo's strategic pass-through pricing creates a more reliable margin over the long term which is evident in today's market and will continue if rare earth magnetic pricing remains stable. As you know, we do not like to speculate on forward-looking rare earth prices, but we will say that through the start of Q4, neodymium and presidium have maintained their pricing stability which is a positive sign. Shifting to strategic initiatives, we continue to execute our top 2 strategic capital projects, namely our European sintered magnetics plant and relocation of our modernized environmental catalyst plant in Zibo. For the sintered magnetics facility, we remain on track and continue to make progress in the early stages of the project, including preparing the site, excavating, laying foundation and sourcing equipment. At our environmental catalyst manufacturing plant, we are nearly complete on erecting all of our building structures and have transitioned into equipment installation. These two capital projects remain a top priority for the company and both are progressing in line with our expectations. Shifting to quarterly financial and operating performance. Within Magnequench, Q3 volumes were higher versus prior quarter and prior year, driven by recovery in automotive, continued growth of the Magnetics business and pulling of certain shipments from Q4 into Q3 due to timing of national holidays in China. Despite the positive volume trend in select end markets, demand remains mixed among regions and applications with continued market softness in Europe and non-automotive applications. In addition, the fourth quarter typically has the lowest seasonal volume of the year and we expect that trend to hold given the timing of our Q3 shipments. The Magnequench segment continues to make strong progress on driving operational efficiencies as well as integrating back-office functions within the newly acquired SG Tech business. In addition, the Magnet business continues to grow and win new platforms in the automotive space. While the size of the Magnet business is small compared to magnetic powders, we are encouraged by both the underlying unit growth and economic profile. We continue to develop product knowledge and expertise in magnets which will be a key strength leading into our European sintered magnet expansion. At C&O, the core business remains mixed although the net result is substantially improved compared to the prior year. EBITDA generation and profitability was substantially improved versus the past four quarters as the adverse impact of lead lag continues to diminish in today's stable rare earth pricing environment. Product shipments in Q3 also improved compared to the same quarter prior year. This is underpinned by continued strength for our specialty heavy rare earth products, our environmental catalyst products and continued momentum in our clean water treatment portfolio. Q4 seasonality in C&O is usually a bit more pronounced than Magnequench, so we would expect product shipments to slow slightly as we approach year-end. However, continued rare earth pricing stability should neutralize the effects of lead lag and translate to greater margin stability for the segment. Our Rare Metals business unit continued to be a reliable contributor in the third quarter, albeit with lower volumes and margins compared to the prior year. Hafnium pricing in the market has remained very strong. However, the end customer demand has normalized. This reflects the aerospace industry getting caught up to a more balanced inventory cycle. Although demand has moderated, the fundamentals of the Hafnium business remains strong and we expect to maintain stable volumes at healthy margins over the coming quarters. In addition, our Gallium Recycling Scrap Material business performed well in Q3 as pricing for gallium has increased substantially as a result of current export restrictions from China. As you are aware, Neo operates the only gallium recycling operation in North America and one of the few recycling operations in the world. China controls 96% of virgin gallium market, so recycling outside of China is a key strength of Neo. As Rahim alluded to, we're very excited to welcome Mohamad El-Mahmoud as our new EVP and business unit leader for Rare Metals. Mohammad’s proven track record as a proactive and operationally savvy leader makes him an extremely valuable asset. We look forward to his ability to implement growth strategies through a highly focused metrics-driven framework. I'd like to close by emphasizing that our balance sheet and cash generation remains strong. We've generated $16 million in cash from operations during the quarter. On a year-to-date basis, we've generated $59 million in cash from operations. We invested $5 million in our key strategic capital projects during the quarter and we have made significant progress on our NCIB program, investing $15.5 million towards repurchasing shares during the quarter, along with returning $3 million to shareholders through our quarterly dividend. We continue to maintain strength and flexibility across our balance sheet with $113 million of cash and cash equivalents. We're excited to move the next phase of our strategic initiatives, our core business generates reliable free cash flow and we remain steadfast on investing our capital into the highest returning growth projects for the company. With that, we'll now open up the line for questions.
Operator: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will open the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Yuri Link from Can accord Genuity.
Yuri Link: Rahim, thanks for the updated strategic road map. I guess the obvious question is what we can expect from the new sintered plant that's under construction in terms of revenue and EBITDA contribution for phase 1? And then as a follow-on to that, when do you think this plant comes online? And can you talk about the qualification process with customers and how long that might take?
Rahim Suleman: Sure. So I'll start with the second half, where we would expect construction to continue through '23, '24, installing equipment in '24 and start making samples and production volumes in '25, probably the tail end of '25 to see production volumes. I think that then ties into the time line for customer qualifications. So the programs that we're targeting are generally programs we are launching in '25 and some in 26. There are some programs that we will target where we will kind of take a me-too type approach where we will join an existing platform. We do have samples in with customers. So we know that we -- our samples are technically meeting the requirements of our customers. So we feel pretty good about that which is, hence, the aggressive view of we need to be accountable to start delivering on some of those things. So that's why I've talked about -- we'll talk about those MOUs with customers within the 3- to 6-month period.
Yuri Link: So first production in late 2025. And is that when the qualification process starts?
Rahim Suleman: No, no. We'll have qualified before then. So we'll be in serial production in 2025.
Yuri Link: So 2026 could be the first year of kind of run rate revenue and EBITDA or I guess...
Rahim Suleman: Look, personally, I think it takes longer. I think it is -- the automotive industry, I think we need to be pragmatic and realistic about what ramp curves really look like. So it will be the cross of 2 different trends, right? The OEMs are trying to get there really, really fast and they're encouraging us to go as fast as we can. And we want to get there as fast as we can and that's where all our deliverables are going to be. So we could kind of make comments on how we'll be at full production in 2026. I've just been in the Tier 1 space for too long to think that we could ramp that quickly in that short of a time frame. So call it a more conservative view, but I think it's not until the end of 2026 or sometime in '27 that we start hitting that kind of a run rate.
Yuri Link: And what is that run rate?
Rahim Suleman: Well, that would be the phase 1 run rate which would be the 2,000 tonnes of blocks, call it, 1,500 tonnes of actual magnet sales for a pricing that's probably in the $80 to $100 range.
Yuri Link: And would that be at the -- what I'm trying to get at is kind of the EBITDA contribution.
Rahim Suleman: Yes. Look, I think you probably use something like 15% EBITDA contribution, is probably a reasonable place to start. Maybe it could be a little bit higher than that, but I might have customers listening. So some number that looks and feels like that is probably a reasonable expectation.
Yuri Link: Okay. And between now and then, I mean, obviously, that's 3, 4 years off. So I mean, is there an opportunity to accelerate your move into sintered magnets before the plant is up and running? Or is -- we're waiting for that?
Rahim Suleman: No. I think acceleration will occur. I think that there is incredible demand pull that I think we'll be building phase 2 prior to that time frame. I also think that we will announce North America within a reasonable short order as well. I won't give you exact dates on that just yet. I mean we'll announce it and then we'll have a glide path for when we're going to launch and get to material volumes there as well. So I think what will happen is it's fair enough to say that there's probably a couple of year period here that folks are waiting for the proof of concept. But I think once you get there, the growth curve on all of phase 1, phase 2 and then North America, will actually be really fast.
Yuri Link: Last one for me and I'll turn it over. What about the supply of this facility? Where are we on supply agreements? And are you changing your tack at all on the upstream plans for the company?
Rahim Suleman: So, yes and no. So when we talk about supply, we have talked a lot about it in terms of an upstream strategy which looks very close to kind of a mining strategy, right? And we have a number of offtake agreements and we have an investment in Greenland. And we have a number of things that we're doing there and we're going to continue to do those things. We're going to continue to investigate offtake agreements. We're going to continue to encourage the supply base. We're going to continue to provide technical advice on flow sheets. We will continue to partner with everyone on the mining side to get them to a product that can be processed by rare earth separators. We still, in Estonia, have the rare separation facility which between ours and the facility that Solvay is going to start separating rare earths for others as well. Lynus is captive, MP is captive, but they can also expand their capacity. There is adequate -- there is going to be a continued need for more separation. But the way that I would kind of differentiate it is this. When you think of the company as its historical -- in its historical frame, it starts with rare separation, right? That was the core of what the company was 30 years ago. That's what everything began by. And when you think about it in those terms, then supply becomes critically important because you're thinking about how do I feed the rare earth separation beast which means you're doing it through an upstream strategy to a mine. When you think of the company as a rare earth magnetics company, you're now 3 or 4 steps separated from the mine. That doesn't mean you don't need a supply strategy, but it means you need a sourcing strategy. It's different than an upstream strategy, because our sourcing strategy can then accommodate all of the material that becomes available from anyone else in the value chain. As I talked about, Magnequench today purchases 90% of its materials for other people. There isn't a requirement we have to get the material straight from the mine. So if any of the mines are announcing they're going to get there and they're going to have separation capacity and all of those types of things, we can buy mined material, we can buy the rare earth oxides, we can buy rare earth metals, we can buy any number of inputs into the Magnequench process [ph]; so it just depends on what your perspective is. We absolutely need a sourcing strategy and that will include upstream. But that's not -- that is customer flexibility, that is optionality. It's not a limiting factor. It's not a dependency for growth. So that's kind of the differentiation that I would make. It's not to say that we're not going to continue to focus on upstream strategies. It's just to say that it's not the limiting factor that it is if you think about it only within the rare earth separation context.
Operator: And your next question comes from the line of David Ocampo from Cormark Securities.
David Ocampo: Thanks. Rahim, I just wanted to touch base here on just the CapEx requirements over the next quarter and into 2024. Because even when I look at Zibo, you guys have spent $18 million to date out of the total $75 million and then you still have the sintered facility. So I was hoping if you could just square up those numbers for us, just for our modeling purposes here.
Rahim Suleman: Sure. So we'll spend a lot more in Zibo in Q4 and then -- I mean, the budget of the project was $75 million of CapEx that had probably a $10 million contingency in it. So I think we're probably going to fit it in maybe even without the contingency. So I think that's where the total CapEx of that project will look like. As Jonathan talked about, the buildings and core infrastructure will all be in place by the end of this year. So a bunch of money will get spent in Q4, a bunch of money will get spent in Q1. But then there'll be money that gets spent throughout the year as there's the finishing process, right? Because that is a long-tail type item. And further, there will be automation, there'll be a bunch of modernization things that we're doing in that facility as well. So order of magnitude, I mean it's really hard to project how much cash gets spent in a single quarter, but I'd say kind of $15 million to $20 million kind of in the short-term period and then another $20 million over the longer-term period to kind of spread out. And I would say the vast majority of that really just gets spent by the end of '24. In terms of the Narva project or the Estonia Magnets project, we're spending money now. We're at the beginning phases of that. I think we -- our CapEx estimate for that project was around $65 million, $70 million. We are still on budget to do that as well. I probably say that 70% of that money probably gets spent in 2024. But again, there's timing around equipment commissioning and when the equipment gets landed. So the exact timing when the cash goes out the door is more variable than that, but that's what we kind of feel like today.
David Ocampo: Got it. That was super helpful there. And then in the MD&A, you've talked a little bit about your efforts to improve the inventory performance at Magnequench. I was just curious what that could mean for the order of magnitude for the lead lag impact on that business and the potential impacts on just your working capital position?
Rahim Suleman: Yes. So we need to take -- and we are taking a much more metrics-based approach and structured approach to getting inventory down. That takes time. There's decades of behaviors that we have to turn into decades -- that we have to turn into data. So it takes time. Within Magnequench, I think that they're doing a good job. They're doing a really good job of reducing inventory levels today. So -- and they're reducing their conversion costs today. So we are seeing kind of the key things that we need to see in terms of return on capital employed improving for Magnequench today. For lead lag, I think it's within Magnequench, the last 2 years has been exceptionally volatile movement in rare earth prices. I would say normally Magnequench can stay within a reasonable range just because of the fact that it also has timing with respect to its sales contracts. So I think we'll reduce inventories in Magnequench, but I think they're on a great path. Where lead lag largely affects us is in the C&O side, but particularly the separation side. And it's an odd dynamic because truthfully, separation doesn't actually contribute that much gross margin on a steady state basis. It's a decent business, but it doesn't actually contribute enormous amounts of gross margin. But when lead lag was benefiting us, it was recording 300% of its expected gross margin. And when lead lag is hurting us, it's reporting negative gross margins. So the real effort needs to be to reduce both lead lag in terms of timing of materials as well as the amount of inventory that we have at C&O because both of those are the most -- are the largest drivers on lead lag and on the volatility of our results. I kind of say the same thing. It's a journey to figure out the right set of metrics and the right set of behaviors. We can't weave a magic wand, but I think that's -- we will get to metrics-based accountability to get that reduced.
Operator: [Operator Instructions]
Ali Mahdavi: Thank you, operator. It seems like we don't have any other questions. Should you have any further follow-ups, please feel free to reach out to me directly. That concludes today's call. I'll turn it over back to the operator to wrap things up. Thank you for attending.
Operator: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude our conference for today. Thank you all for participating. You may all disconnect.